Spear Institute has called for a major overhaul of Ghana’s flood management approach, urging authorities to shift from responding to disasters after they occur to investing in long
The report indicates that spear Institute has called for a major overhaul of Ghana’s flood management approach, urging authorities to shift from responding to disasters after they occur to investing in long-term prevention and climate resilience.
It further notes that the research firm made the call during a virtual media briefing on Friday, August 7, 2026, where it examined the country’s recurring flood crisis and proposed measures to reduce its impact.
The session, themed “Flooding in Ghana: Paddling to Safety or Avoiding a Repeat,” analysed the causes and consequences of flooding through four areas: socioeconomic conditions, governance, engineering and infrastructure, and project management.
According to Spear Institute, flooding has been a recurring challenge in Ghana for decades, but the growing impact on lives, businesses, infrastructure and livelihoods requires a more coordinated national response.
Using the June 29, 2026 floods in Accra as a case study, the institute stated the disaster exposed weaknesses in drainage systems, land-use planning and disaster preparedness.
It stated the floods led to major disruptions, including impassable roads, flooded homes and businesses, and interruptions to transport and commercial activities.
The institute reported that more than 12 people lost their lives, seven were missing, and 7,761 households were displaced across 18 affected assemblies following the incident.
Spear Institute identified climate change, rapid urbanisation and the destruction of natural flood-control systems such as wetlands as key factors worsening the impact and frequency of floods.
It noted that increasing population growth and unplanned development are placing additional pressure on vulnerable areas.
The research firm emphasised that flooding is a complex challenge that cannot be addressed by one sector alone, requiring coordinated action across government, communities and private stakeholders.
On the social and economic dimensions of flooding, Spear Institute stated poverty and inequality often increase exposure to flood risks.
It explained that some low-income households occupy flood-prone areas due to limited access to affordable and safer housing options.
The institute also warned that households and small businesses without insurance, savings or access to credit often struggle to recover after losing property, equipment and sources of income.
While identifying indiscriminate waste disposal as a contributor to blocked drains and waterways, the institute cautioned against placing the entire responsibility on citizens.
