Meta's decision to settle the case on Wednesday came as a surprise.
The report indicates that meta’s decision to settle the case on Wednesday came as a surprise.
It further notes that i was expecting weeks of courtroom drama as 29 states – almost two-thirds of North America – took on one US tech giant.
Technically, the trial was about children’s online privacy. It was based on a US law called the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which is nearly 30 years old and predates all of today’s biggest social platforms.
It centred on Meta’s historic collection and use of data from children under 13 over several years.
In reality, it was a co-ordinated attack on the firm’s online safety credentials.
Meta, alongside other social media apps, is under fire around the world as 2026 is shaping up to be a year of reckoning for the entire industry – perhaps our days of doomscrolling are numbered.
Meta has fought hard, over multiple lawsuits spanning many months and at great expense, to defend its commitment to protecting children on its platforms.
More than once, I’ve been invited to detailed presentations at Meta’s London HQ, where senior executives have walked journalists like me through the many safety tools the company has launched over the years designed to give children better protection on its apps.
I have also met the parents of young people who have come to harm on those same platforms, and others who admit to being totally overwhelmed by the sheer number of safety tools that require their oversight – at the last count Meta had more than 60 of them, and that was just on Instagram.
The trial went on for just five days, and came to an end before CEO Mark Zuckerberg took to the stand.
Whistleblower Arturo Bejar, who once worked at Instagram, claimed that in the past he had told bosses that harmful stuff was happening to children on the platform, and no action was taken.
Another executive stated he didn’t remember writing in a slide deck that Meta sometimes chose to pay fines for violating regulations rather than make changes.
Internal memos suggested that the firm knew opt-in tools tended to have low adoption rates, yet it still launched safety features that were not enabled by default.
There had been intense speculation that Meta would have faced hundreds of billions of dollars in fines if it had lost.
